A Scoping Literature Review of Simulation Training Program Curriculum Standards.

SUMMARY STATEMENT: Simulation educator training is well supported in the literature and endorsed by the Society of Simulation in Healthcare as well as the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning. Despite growth of domestic and international training programs, there is a lack of consensus regarding curriculum standards. Our aim was to identify core curricular components of comprehensive simulation training programs. A scoping literature review of all relevant publications from 2000 to 2020 was conducted using a 6-step design. A team of 10 multidisciplinary, international simulation educators independently reviewed all citations with discrepancies resolved by third-person review. Of the initial 320 identified unique publications, a total of 15 articles were included, all published within the last 6 years. Four themes were identified: domains (n = 6), competencies (n = 3), objectives (n = 8), and other characteristics (n = 3). The findings support a greater understanding of the core curricular content across simulation training programs to support standardization.

Simulation-Based Examination of Arterial Line Insertion Method Reveals Interdisciplinary Practice Differences.

INTRODUCTION: Arterial cannulation is frequently performed on intensive care unit (ICU) and operating room patients; a 1% complication rate has been reported. Investigators applied simulation to study clinical providers' arterial catheter (AC) insertion performance and to assess for interdisciplinary and intradisciplinary variation that may contribute to complications. METHODS: Anesthesia, medical critical care, and surgical critical care providers with AC insertion experience were enrolled at 2 academic hospitals. Each subject completed a simulated AC insertion on an in situ task trainer. Using a Delphi-derived checklist that incorporated published recommendations, expert opinion, and institutional requirements, 2 investigators completed offline video reviews to compare subjects' technical performance. RESULTS: Ten anesthesia, 11 medical ICU (MICU, 1 excluded), and 10 surgical ICU (SICU) subjects with significant between-group differences in training level and AC insertion experience were enrolled for 2 years. Differences in procedural planning, equipment preparation, and patient preparation steps did not attain significance across groups except for anesthesia participants using only ad hoc AC kits, and MICU and SICU subjects preferentially using commercial kits (P < 0.001). Time-outs were completed by 1 anesthesia subject, 5 MICU subjects, and 4 SICU subjects (P = 0.29, NS). For proceduralist preparation steps, fewer anesthesiology subjects donned gowns (P < 0.001). Only MICU subjects used ultrasound guidance (P = 0.0053), and only MICU (100%) and SICU (100%) subjects sutured ACs in place. Overall observance of sterile technique was similar across groups at 70% to 100% (P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Simulated AC insertions revealed procedural performance variability that may derive from individual provider differences, discipline-based practice parameters, and setting-specific cultural factors.

Communicating Value in Simulation: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Return on Investment.

Value-based health care requires a balancing of medical outcomes with economic value. Administrators need to understand both the clinical and the economic effects of potentially expensive simulation programs to rationalize the costs. Given the often-disparate priorities of clinical educators relative to health care administrators, justifying the value of simulation requires the use of economic analyses few physicians have been trained to conduct. Clinical educators need to be able to present thorough economic analyses demonstrating returns on investment and cost-effectiveness to effectively communicate with administrators. At the 2017 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference "Catalyzing System Change through Health Care Simulation: Systems, Competency, and Outcomes," our breakout session critically evaluated the cost-benefit and return on investment of simulation. In this paper we provide an overview of some of the economic tools that a clinician may use to present the value of simulation training to financial officers and other administrators in the economic terms they understand. We also define three themes as a call to action for research related to cost-benefit analysis in simulation as well as four specific research questions that will help guide educators and hospital leadership to make decisions on the value of simulation for their system or program.

Communicating Value in Simulation: Cost Benefit Analysis and Return on Investment.

Value-based health care requires a balancing of medical outcomes with economic value. Administrators need to understand both the clinical and economic effects of potentially expensive simulation programs to rationalize the costs. Given the often-disparate priorities of clinical educators relative to health care administrators, justifying the value of simulation requires the use of economic analyses few physicians have been trained to conduct. Clinical educators need to be able to present thorough economic analyses demonstrating returns on investment and cost effectiveness to effectively communicate with administrators. At the 2017 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference "Catalyzing System Change through Health Care Simulation: Systems, Competency, and Outcomes", our breakout session critically evaluated the cost benefit and return on investment of simulation. In this paper we provide an overview of some of the economic tools that a clinician may use to present the value of simulation training to financial officers and other administrators in the economic terms they understand. We also define three themes as a call to action for research related to cost benefit analysis in simulation as well as four specific research questions that will help guide educators and hospital leadership to make decisions on the value of simulation for their system or program. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Neurologic Deep Dive: A Simulation Case of Diagnosing and Treating Decompression Sickness for Emergency Medicine Residents.

INTRODUCTION: Decompression sickness (DCS) is a rare and dangerous complication from a rapid decrease in environmental pressure, commonly seen in patients leaving a compressed-air environment, such as scuba divers, aviators, and deep tunnel workers. Failure to clinically diagnose and adequately treat DCS with hydration and supplemental oxygen before bridging to hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy can result in permanent residual symptoms or, in rare cases, death. Despite the increasing incidence of DCS, there are limited published simulation case studies discussing this perilous environmental exposure. METHODS: This fictional simulation case is written for emergency medicine residents to diagnose and manage DCS from a live-actor patient presenting with unilateral neurologic symptoms and concealed cyanotic mottling (cutis marmorata). This case ran for four separate iterations at a simulation center, with a resident, fellow, and attending acting as specific confederates for their respective roles. Following each case, the learners were debriefed at bedside, discussed a PowerPoint presentation, and underwent a question-and-answer session. RESULTS: Based on postsimulation qualitative assessments, junior and senior residents correctly identified DCS, but junior residents alone were less likely to elicit pertinent social history or to fully physically examine the patient without the presence of senior residents. Both resident groups were able to verbally explain the fundamental DCS pathophysiology to the patient, but junior residents were unable to specifically direct oxygenation, hydration, and HBO protocols for DCS. After case completion and debriefing, all learners demonstrated achievement of primary learning objectives. DISCUSSION: Overall, we noted this case worked well for junior EM residents with senior-resident backup. Both learner groups appreciated the concealed elements of case, including scuba diving history and exposed dermatologic findings, and reported that these were invaluable learning moments for all future patient encounters, not just those limited to DCS.

Impact of cardiovascular comorbidity on ovarian cancer mortality.

BACKGROUND: A retrospective cohort study utilizing prospectively collected data was conducted from August 2003 until March 2008 at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. It is unknown whether cardiovascular comorbidity and chronic stress impact ovarian cancer outcome, which remains poor despite advances in therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether cardiovascular disease and markers that may be associated with stress are also associated with survival in patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: Participants with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer were followed until time of death or truncation of study period (median follow-up = 4.2 years; n = 271). Tumor characteristics (stage, tumor grade, histology, debulking status), demographic variables, and cardiovascular comorbidity were documented and compared to overall survival. RESULTS: Of the nine cardiovascular events tracked during follow-up, venous thromboembolism [VTE; HR, 3.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.8-5.5] and pulmonary hypertension (HR, 8.5; 95% CI, 3.9-18.7) were associated with shorter survival in multivariate analysis. In addition, high tumor grade, suboptimal cytoreduction, and baseline heart rate (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) were related to decreased survival. CONCLUSION: Careful management of certain cardiovascular comorbidities may extend survival in patients with ovarian cancer. Our findings suggest that increased baseline heart rate and the development of VTE and pulmonary hypertension after cancer diagnosis may be significant predictors of survival in women with ovarian cancer. IMPACT: Our study emphasizes the importance of identifying and optimally treating tachycardia, VTE, and pulmonary hypertension in conjunction with cancer therapy.